Von: Alexander

Alexander — Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:29:54 +0000

Carl Trueman bemerkt, dass nichts von dem, was im dritten Absatz oben aufgführt wird, zum Bruch zwischen Stott und Lloyd-Jones führte. Wichtig ist gleichfalls sein Hinweis, „schism“ sei im Kontext der GC nicht der passende Begriff:
„Second, the use of the word „schisms“ is unfortunate. Schism is an ecclesiological word. It has no meaning outside of a church context. Is this perhaps a Freudian slip, revealing that the Gospel Coalition is unconsciously looked on as a church, precisely the problem which makes others wary of coalition bodies that might supplant the church?“
zur Unterhaltung noch Truemans dritter Hinweis:
„Third, given the fact that both my wife and I entered the world shortly after the 1966 split [i.e. zwischen Stott und L-J], we are both delighted to know that our births are `recent‘ and that we can therefore still make credible claims to youth. Thanks for that, Justin. It has made my wife’s day, brother! Though maybe I should demit my eldership — doesn’t Paul have something to say about a minister or elder not being a `recent‘ convert?“
von hier: http://www.reformation21.org/blog/2011/04/a-touch-of-freud.php

Kommentare zu: Mark Noll: Nutzen und Gefahren der »Gospel Coalition«

Von: Alexander